Abstract:
For many years, a debate has been going on, sometimes heated, other times controlled, about the quality of research that is being carried out in the Middle East and how it compares to that of the larger European countries. Why this should be so owes as much to the difficulties and peculiarities of the region as to the myths that were created and disseminated by the people in the industry. The paper will firstly look at the difficulties and how these were overcome, and then at the myths and their perpetrators. The difficulties centre around sampling methods in the absence of easily available sampling frames and the lack of trained personnel, especially interviewers. It will be shown how sampling frames were painstakingly constructed and how an organisation was created to train and control interviewers. It will show how telephone interviewing is feasible in certain circumstances and impossible in others. Finally, the paper will show how low literacy rates were overcome and self-completion of certain questions was emulated, using magnetic boards and graphic presentations. This did not produce, however, any significantly different results from the usual methods.
This could also be of interest:
Research Papers
Alternative qualitative methodologies
Catalogue: ESOMAR Congress 1997: Learning From The Future
Authors: Sue Redfern, Jennie Maitland, Tracey White
Company: KANTAR TNS Malaysia
September 1, 1997
Research Papers
Identifying 'early adopters' internationally, using three dimensions
Catalogue: Asia Pacific 2002
Authors: Rosi Ware, Michelle Crellin
 
December 1, 2002
Research Papers
How to make good dough
Catalogue: ESOMAR Conference on Excellence in Consumer Insights 2004
Authors: Sinéad Twomey, Pia de Wit
Companies: Unilever, SKIM
April 18, 2004
