Abstract:
This methodological case study illustrates differences in data quality resulting from different online panel recruitment methods. Survey data from two B2B online panels were compared to each other and to data collected from a phone-to-Web sample. One of the online panels was developed via targeted solicitations to B2B Web sites (similar to the non-probability sampling most seen in use today), whereas the other was an ongoing online panel that had been originally recruited by telephone using probabilistic sampling. Many of the problems attributed to online panels (such as "straightlining" or "flatlining") were markedly reduced in the online panel using telephone recruitment with probabilistic sampling, and data from that panel were more robust in statistical analyses. We use this case study to illustrate these differences, and present guidelines for building panels that produce high quality data.
This could also be of interest:
Research Papers
Panel and data quality
Catalogue: Panel Research 2006
Authors: Holland Hofman Brown, Renee Smith
Company: Harris Interactive (Europe)
October 8, 2006
Research Papers
Duplication and multisource panel recruitment
Catalogue: Panel Research 2007
Authors: Sam Berteloot, Kristof De Wulf
 
October 28, 2007
Research Papers
Panel proliferation and quality concerns
Catalogue: ESOMAR Panel Research Conference 2005
Author: John H. Faasse
 
April 17, 2005
