Abstract:
The quality of any audience measurement system is dependent on the quality of the sample upon which its data are based. This paper presents the results of two pieces of research that examine different aspects of A.C. Nielsen's network people meter sample in Canada. The first piece of research looked at the extent to which people who say they would agree to have a people meter installed in their homes differ from those who do not. Thus, it addresses the representativeness of the households initially agreeing to participate in a people meter panel. The second looks at the effects of ongoing participation in the panel on sample respondents. It considers whether ongoing participation may lead to fatigue effects in recording viewing and whether this is more pronounced among some types of respondents than others.
This could also be of interest:
Research Papers
Facing panel non-response, consequences and solutions
Catalogue: ESOMAR Congress 1982: Fitting Research To Turbulent Times
Authors: Peter S.H. Leeflang, A. J. Olivier
 
June 15, 1982
Research Papers
Covering non-response: Does it pay?
Catalogue: ESOMAR Congress 1978: Value For Money In Market And Social Research
Author: Emile M. C. van Westerhoven
 
September 1, 1978
Research Papers
Peoplemeters in non-telephone homes
Catalogue: ESOMAR/ARF Seminar 1998: Electronic Media And Measurement Trends
Author: Stanislaw Bebenek
 
June 15, 1998
