Abstract:
This paper addresses some of the issues pertinent to the mapping process with the aim of simplifying the choice of alternatives. A number of commonly used and recently developed mapping methods are systematically compared by partitioning the mapping process into its individual components to examine which (if any) have the largest effect and which have relatively no effect on the map obtained. Results of the comparative analysis, in conjunction with evidence from related research, are then used to suggest some practical guidelines to assist in the selection of appropriate mapping techniques.
This could also be of interest:
Research Papers
Fragrance choice and perceptual mapping
Catalogue: Seminar 1989: Research For Flavours And Fragrances
Author: Ivor Shalofsky
 
June 15, 1989
Research Papers
Multivariate mapping
Catalogue: Seminar 1992: Do New Technologies Help Or Hinder Marketing Decisions?
Authors: Susan Stanley, Anthony Khan
Company: Unilever
June 15, 1992
Research Papers
Brand mapping
Catalogue: ESOMAR/JMA/ARF Conference 1988: Innovation In Marketing, Advertising And Research
Authors: Juanita M. Byrne-Quinn, Michael M. Roe
 
June 15, 1988
