Abstract:
In a readership survey conducted in London, one interview in every three had been tape recorded. Through follow-up intensive interviews, conducted the next day, estimates were developed of the accuracy of certain of the information collected in the first interview. This situation provided an opportunity to compare: a. the estimated accuracy of information collected in the readership survey when a tape recorder was used with b. the estimated accuracy of such information when a tape recorder was not used. The recorded and the non-recorded samples were closely matched, on an empirical basis, in order to increase the meaningfulness of the comparison of (estimated) accuracy with and without the recorder being used. The comparison made here is of 189 recorded estimates (from 105 people) and of 430 non-recorded estimates (from 226 people). The small numbers involved make this a small-scale study, so that its results must be regarded as indicative and not final.
This could also be of interest:
Research Reports
Tape and video recording of interviews and group discussion
Catalogue: ESOMAR Codes And Guidelines
Author: ESOMAR B.V.
 
January 1, 1991
Research Reports
Qualitative research on P.I.B. tape
Catalogue: CRAM/Peter Cooper Archive Collection
Author: CRAM/Peter Cooper Archive
 
July 1, 1970
Research Reports
Passive data collection observation and recording
Catalogue: ESOMAR Codes And Guidelines
Author: ESOMAR B.V.
 
June 15, 2009
