Abstract:
Survey design has been slow to respond to the key lessons from Behavioral Economics that we often act first, then rationalize our action. The presenters hypothesized that replacing survey methods that assumed rationality with methods that accommodated 'predictably irrational' behavior would lead to greater accuracy. Accordingly, a best-in-class traditional approach (monadic) was tested against a discrete-choice exercise with a naturalistic user interface, as well as more natural alternatives to the traditional 'none of the above' Across four CPG categories, the techniques inspired by Behavioral Economics better predicted actual market volumes than traditional techniques.
This could also be of interest:
Research Papers
Pop-up surveys
Catalogue: New Monograph Series Vol.10: Marketing Research in a .com Environment
Author: Pete Comley
 
June 15, 2000
Research Papers
Reliability and sensitivity of research surveys
Catalogue: ESOMAR Congress 1983: Demonstrating The Contribution Of Research
Author: Norman L. Webb
Company: Gallup International Association
June 15, 1983
Research Papers
Designing bonsai surveys
Catalogue: Asia Pacific 2014: Celebrating Asian Creativity
Author: Jon Puleston
 
May 13, 2014
![The documents and videos are available for ESOMAR members only!](/static/img/ana_document_bg.png)