Abstract:
This paper discusses the distinctions that should be made in media scheduling between the theories of how advertising works (response functions and decay) and the tactics of media buying (cover and frequency). It draws on the modeling analysis work of Simon Broadbent (1997-1998) commissioned by Leo Burnett Media that includes both single source analysis and time-series modeling of adstock. It positions scheduling as a strategic choice about aggregate sales effects under the conditions specified while it places decisions about high or low repetition and cover criteria as micro or tactical choices about the quality of TV time and the way we think a campaign works on individuals. It also suggests a practical multi-dimensional framework in which to deal with both ideas better linking overall brand communication strategies to media buying tactics.
This could also be of interest:
Research Papers
Untangling the confusion of TV scheduling theories
Catalogue: Seminar 1998: Towards Total Communications Strategies
Author: Jayne Zenaty Spittler
 
October 20, 1998
Research Papers
Next generation TV advertisement scheduling
Catalogue: Asia Pacific 2005
Authors: Akito Nakai, Hiroshi Onishi
Company: Video Research Ltd.
March 13, 2005
Research Papers
TV audience segmentation since 1991, developing tool for programme and scheduling planning
Catalogue: Seminar 1994: From Door-To-Door To Satellite
Author: Seija Nurmi
 
June 15, 1994
