Abstract:
In order to answer questions concerning factors affecting click-through rate and to compare them to factors affecting intention to click and attitude toward the ad, the authors of this paper summarize two separate studies that they have performed. The main difference found concerned the use of gimmicks, which acted favourably on the click-through rate but had no effect (it even tended to be negative) on intention to click. Moreover it created irritation since it had a negative effect on the liking score of the banner. On the other hand it is interesting to note that all being equal (interest, liking), gimmicks seem to enhance the intention to click. Further research is needed to validate the suggestion that this is due to the simulation of interactivity. Images were more deceptive concerning the effect of animation: a significant effect on the click-through rate was not found. Contrarily animation seems to stimulate intention to click. Not mentioning the brand name seems to have a negative effect on intention to click (but no effect on the click-through rate).
This could also be of interest:
Research Papers
Impact test on the Internet
Catalogue: ESOMAR Net Effects 1999
Authors: Claudia Willner, Martin Mayr
 
June 15, 1999
Research Papers
Creating an Internet research panel in countries with low penetration
Catalogue: Latin America 2001
Authors: Manuel Barberena, Gloria Labastida
Company: Pearson S.A. de C.V.
May 1, 2001
Research Papers
How internet advertising works
Catalogue: New Monograph Series Vol.10: Marketing Research in a .com Environment
Authors: Rex Briggs, Horst Stipp
 
June 15, 2000
