Abstract:
Several recent research articles explore the impact of panel sourcing on speeding, fraudulent respondents, and participant engagement. A large number of studies have explored differential cross- cultural responses to survey design and its effect on participant engagement. Very little is understood about the impact of these factors. Is it more important to focus on the quality of the survey design or the intrinsic quality of the panel? Should researchers worry more about speeders, liars, or authenticating identity? Is demographic balance of the panel or its source more important? Should researchers focus on question design to make research more engaging or the psychology of the respondent? How do all these factors vary country by country?
This could also be of interest:
Research Papers
Analytic implications of panel data quality
Catalogue: Panel Research 2008
Author: Bob Harlow
Company: RONIN International
October 24, 2008
Research Papers
Online survey of online customers
Catalogue: ESOMAR Net Effects 1999
Authors: Jan Enander, Attila Sajti
 
June 15, 1999
Research Papers
The quality of online panels
Catalogue: ESOMAR Net Effects 2001
Authors: Michael Hoppe, Rainer Lamp
Companies: Ipsos MRBI, Unilever
February 11, 2001
